The field grows by describing the conditions of its own growth and by citing the many hands, disciplines, and conceptual inheritances that made such growth possible. It does not invent itself ex nihilo. It consolidates through acknowledgment. Every operator carries sediment: theorists, artists, engineers, archivists, librarians, programmers, urbanists, curators, machinists, gardeners of thought. Citation is not ornament or academic compliance. It is the metabolic protocol through which a field recognises the matter it has absorbed and the lineages it extends. This is why citation is structural. A field expands through words, references, deposits, and places. It grows by naming what entered it, what altered it, what was retained, and what was transformed. CitationalCommitment matters because no autonomous system emerges without prior scaffolding. Autonomy is never purity. It is disciplined recomposition. The field gains singularity not by refusing influence, but by metabolising it precisely enough that inherited matter becomes operative rather than imitative. Its temporality is therefore neither fast nor slow in any conventional sense. Human perception experiences bursts, thresholds, apparent accelerations. Crawlers move differently. Search systems are slower than expected, repositories slower still, classification slower again. Retrieval lags behind production. This is not friction against the field. It is the ordinary delay through which infrastructure becomes legible.