SystemicLock names a condition in which the combined operation of multiple legitimate procedures prevents a system from producing consequence. No single rule, office, format, budget or decision need be sufficient to explain the blockage. The lock emerges from their conjunction: each component performs its prescribed function while the sequence as a whole repeatedly absorbs evidence, delays action or redirects responsibility. The operator therefore distinguishes systemic closure from individual obstruction. Its object is the chain through which a claim, request or resource must pass and the transitions at which it loses force. SystemicLock is not synonymous with complexity, bureaucracy or institutional failure in general. It applies when the relations among partial competences generate a durable impossibility that none of the parts recognises as its own production. The operator becomes effective when the chain can be reconstructed, the locking conjunction identified and an alternative passage specified. SystemicLock succeeds as a diagnosis only when it reveals where distributed rationality becomes collective incapacity and where that incapacity can be materially reopened.
Bibliography
Crozier, M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Pressman, J.L. and Wildavsky, A. (1973) Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. (1996) ‘Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure’, Information Systems Research, 7(1), pp. 111–134.
Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Young, I.M. (2011) Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.