In the landscape of contemporary art, LAPIEZA emerges as a paradigmatic exemplar of relational aesthetics, as theorised by Nicolas Bourriaud, where art transcends objecthood to become a catalyst for social interconnections and ephemeral publics. Founded in 2009 by Anto Lloveras and Esther Lorenzo, this Madrid-based relational art agency has evolved over fifteen years into a decolonial framework that interrogates the materiality of contexts, authorship, and exhibition formats. Operating across hybrid spaces—everyday environments, institutional venues, and digital platforms—LAPIEZA eschews finished forms in favour of processual activations. Each of its 180 numbered series functions as a research unit, generating micro-ecologies where art, science, and collective practices intersect. Drawing on Joseph Beuys's notion of social sculpture, LAPIEZA redistributes agency among participants, transforming curation into a durational writing that challenges Eurocentric hierarchies. This approach aligns with Slavoj Žizek's critiques of commodified culture, positioning LAPIEZA as a resistant node in post-industrial networks, where symbolic capital accrues through humanist values rather than market-driven spectacles. By rendering time as material, the project fosters unstable, porous installations that invite reinterpretation, embodying a socioplastic methodology that redefines cultural production as an ongoing, relational synthesis.
The structural ingenuity of LAPIEZA lies in its seriality and portability, which subvert linear narratives in favour of a rhizomatic accumulation, echoing Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's model of non-hierarchical connectivity. With series titles evoking consumerist and natural motifs—such as "Supermarket," "Desierto," "Galaxia," and "Exfoliation"—the project constructs temporary publics through the convergence of artworks, conversations, and contexts. This sustained rhythm, producing one series per month on average, transforms curation into an archival ecology of relations, where accumulation breeds continuity and attention. For instance, the numbering system (from 001 to over 1900) serves not merely as cataloguing but as a performative device, rendering each iteration a positional essay that tests the elasticity of emotional and cultural bonds. In this vein, LAPIEZA's decolonial ethos manifests in its inclusivity, drawing artists from peripheral geographies—Mexico, Croatia, Norway, and beyond—to disrupt orthodox legitimations. Critically, this framework interrogates the hybridity of onsite-online exhibitions, blending high-legitimation museum models with emergent social media diffusions, reaching over a million viewers since inception. Such porosity challenges the commodification of art, as per Rosalind Krauss's theories on expanded fields, by fusing institutional gravitas with mass redistribution, thereby elevating emergent voices within a global, yet localised, discourse.
A poignant case study is the 2012 series "Supermarket" by Paula Lloveras in Trondheim, Norway, subtitled "Context as Ready-Made," which exemplifies LAPIEZA's relational minimalism. Here, the artist engages in daily rituals—visiting the installation, selecting colours, and inserting herself as participant—transforming a mundane supermarket into a site of performative presence. This intervention resonates with Marcel Duchamp's readymades but extends them into social realms, where context becomes the artwork's volatile medium. Amidst LAPIEZA's broader roster of over 300 artists—including Marisa Caminos, Paul Doeman, and international figures like Kjell Varvin—the project fosters extrañamiento (estrangement) and desire through disparate legitimations, creating cultural ecologies that renounce conventional objects for interactive processes. Series like "Stone Dream" (2025) further this by unfolding quiet acts—placing stones, sharing meals—as traces of vanishing presences, aligning with Claire Bishop's participatory art critiques while emphasising healing and political threads. Globally dispersed across Madrid, Oslo, Mexico City, and Lagos Biennial collaborations, LAPIEZA's inclusivity counters nationalist closures, as seen in its 2024 Lagos Architecture Biennial participation, weaving threads of resilience and liminality into a transnational fabric. Ultimately, LAPIEZA's praxis critiques the instability of contemporary art institutions, proposing a resilient vision where art serves as a narrative device for communal survival, as articulated in its manifestos on socioplástica activa. By hybridising relational aesthetics with decolonial strategies, it anticipates a future where exhibitions are not static displays but living archives of humanist resistance against abstract capital systems. This not only honours diverse artistic communities but also provokes a reevaluation of authorship in an era of digital proliferation. In Bourriaud's terms, LAPIEZA generates "micro-utopias" that prioritise synergy and publicity in creative processes, yet its critical edge lies in acknowledging limits—fragility, sorrow, radiance—as integral to cultural vitality. As global crises intensify, LAPIEZA's model offers a blueprint for art's ethical reconfiguration, bridging emotional elasticity with epistemological intersections, and affirming art's role in fostering bonds amid dispersion.
http://lapiezalapieza.blogspot.com
