The constellation of external researchers in the POSTORYα initiative reflects a dynamic epistemic field where historiographical practice merges with cultural sovereignty, bridging disciplines such as philosophy, anthropology, architecture, political theory, and contemporary art through a mnemohistorical lens; Antonio Terrasa, a scholar of early modern nobility and political natures, contributes from CIDEHUS–Évora and engages POSTORY through the recursive question of memory and legitimacy; Clara Ramas, with a rigorous trajectory in Marxist critique, ontology and modern political forms, anchors her contribution in a structural understanding of subjectivity and state logic, both within and beyond her institutional roles at Más Madrid and academia; Concepción Cortés articulates a groundbreaking approach to non-human agency in contemporary art, positioning animals not merely as symbolic figures but as interlocutors and epistemic co-producers in post-60s art ecologies; Anto Lloveras, an architect-curator operating from LAPIEZA Art Series, develops the Socioplastic Console as a recursive cultural machine that metabolises archival, spatial and narrative inputs through a ten-valve sovereign stack, generating epistemic heat and resisting algorithmic flattening; Marc Morell, with a focus on urban class differential, expands Boissevain’s touristic anthropology toward critical analyses of spatial commodification in the Mediterranean, linking housing struggles to financial expropriation; Domingo Centenero revives the ambiguities of Castilian urban politics and Iberian imperial tensions, integrating early modern conflictualities with present questions of sovereignty and autonomy; Adrián Almazán, a philosopher-physicist hybrid, forges ties between ecological transitions, material critique, and techno-social paradigms, placing epistemic resistance at the core of postcapitalist ethics; collectively, these researchers embody POSTORY's hypothesis: that contemporary historical craft is not merely archival but strategically insurgent, operating across media, institutions, and disciplines to produce mnemonic infrastructures fit for contested presents; in this arrangement, POSTORYα becomes more than a research group—it acts as a multi-sited epistemic device, grounding political memory in recursive dialogue with urbanism, art practice and techno-semiotic resistance. –
