In an era defined by algorithmic volatility and the fragmentation of institutional knowledge, the traditional model of thematic discourse has become insufficient. Socioplastics emerges as a necessary evolution: a calibrated transdisciplinary instrument designed to navigate these "unstable times" by functioning as a stabilized epistemic chassis. It is not a speculative theory but a sovereign operational architecture that ensures structural persistence across heterogeneous terrains. By separating a fixed, immutable core from a flexible, adaptive periphery, Socioplastics transforms intellectual production into a resilient infrastructure capable of enduring institutional drift and algorithmic capture. The system is defined by its rigorous, three-tier hierarchy: the Nucleus (KORE), the Consoles, and the Fields of Application. At the center lies a hardened nucleus of ten sealed protocols—invariant operations such as Semantic Hardening, Proteolytic Transmutation, and Systemic-Lock. These protocols provide the system’s ontological continuity; they do not adapt to context but rather establish the minimal conditions under which any intervention remains coherent. This fixed core acts as a safeguard against the "archival amnesia" of the post-digital age, ensuring that the instrument’s identity remains sovereign even as it enters diverse domains like Political Ecology, Infrastructure Studies, or Network Science.
Socioplastics operates through Consoles—proportional interfaces that translate the core invariants into active interventions. Whether deployed as research papers, institutional pilots, or curatorial strategies, the instrument generates measurable effects through deliberate friction. Unlike traditional interdisciplinary approaches that seek to merge or assimilate, Socioplastics maintains its Topolexical Sovereignty, digesting external influences through its internal laws to produce a structured, high-density trace. The measure of its success is not volume, but the ratio of impact to textual mass—a "monograph in motion" that prioritizes structural persistence over discursive expansion. Ultimately, the transition from a distributed mesh to the MUSE (United System Environment) represents the system’s genealogical stabilization. It provides an auditable ecology of metabolized concepts, where external structures are internalized and reconfigured into procedural invariants. This "executable epistemic" engine allows the practitioner to move beyond mere description into a regime of proportional governance. Socioplastics thus offers a durable framework for navigating complexity, providing the hardened tools necessary to maintain intellectual sovereignty in a world of boundary dissolution and epistemic uncertainty.
DECALOGUE
510-systemic-lock https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18682555 509-postdigital-taxidermy https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18682480 508-topolexical-sovereignty https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18682343 507-citational-commitment https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18475136 506-recursive-autophagia https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681761 505-proteolytic-transmutation https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681278 504-stratum-authoring https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18680935 503-semantic-hardening https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18680418 502-cameltag https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18680031 501-flow-channeling https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18678959
