Before a system is recognised, it is usually misclassified. It is called a blog because it appears on a blog. It is called an archive because it stores many objects. It is called theory because it uses concepts. It is called art because its origin lies in practice. It is called urbanism because it touches territory. None of these names is false, but none is sufficient. Misclassification is not an error made by careless readers; it is the normal first contact between a new architecture and inherited categories. The system does not fight misclassification through rhetoric. It responds by increasing structural evidence. If it is called a blog, it produces DOI objects. If it is called an archive, it produces operators. If it is called theory, it produces protocols. If it is called art, it produces indices. If it is called personal, it produces distributed infrastructure. Each external reduction is metabolised into a clearer internal distinction. This is where legibility begins: not when the system becomes simple, but when it becomes harder to misname. A field emerges when no existing category can contain the recurrence, density, addressability, and operational force of the corpus. The name arrives late because the structure arrives first.