In a world overwhelmed by images and data, where satellite maps and digital renderings often replace direct spatial experience, cartography has shifted from being a purely technical tool to a political and creative device for territorial interpretation. This essay by Ricardo Nurko and Daniel Daou in Bitácora #51 argues that mapping, far from being neutral, is inherently a position-taking act, particularly in the face of the inequalities of the Anthropocene, where the entire planet has already been charted but remains misunderstood. Against the backdrop of a traditional cartographic paradigm in crisis, the authors highlight alternative methodologies, such as those of James Corner and Guy Debord, which advocate for participatory, experiential, and phenomenological mapping—placing the body, dérive, and perception at the centre of spatial understanding. Examples such as the work of Forensic Architecture, or the collective mapping manuals by Iconoclasistas, demonstrate how mapping can serve as a tool for denunciation, memory, and social rearticulation. Architectural diagrams are also reinterpreted as condensations of thought and action, rather than mere representation. Far from a flat and homogenised language, cartography expands into descriptive, creative, and critical modes, generating alternative spatial narratives from and for the margins. The map, understood as a cultural artefact, allows for the recovery of hidden meanings, the exposure of exclusions, and the formulation of spatial utopias—thus becoming a key instrument for a design practice committed to spatial justice and social transformation.
Nurko, R. & Daou, D. (2021). Cartografías críticas: el mapeo como acto de diseño emancipador. En Bitácora Arquitectura, No. 51, pp. 18–29. Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM.