Access to a city — the right to walk its streets, use its parks, occupy its public spaces — is only the thinner half of what the right to the city actually means; the fuller claim, harder won and far less often granted, is the right to change the rules that determine what those streets, parks and spaces are for in the first place. Inhabitants who can only use a city on terms set entirely by others remain visitors with permanent residence rather than genuine participants in what the city becomes. Right to the city, understood this way, is exercised through the capacity to revise priorities, not merely through permission to occupy what already exists unchanged. EmancipationEvent closes the sequence appropriately: the moment a city's rules genuinely become rewritable by the people living under them, rather than merely usable, is the emancipation the whole right-to-the-city argument has been building toward from its opening claim about access alone.
Arruzza, C., Bhattacharya, T. and Fraser, N. (2019) Feminism for the 99%: A Manifesto. London: Verso.
Caldeira, T.P.R. (1996) 'Fortified Enclaves: The New Urban Segregation'. Public Culture, 8(2), pp. 303-328.
Auyero, J. (2012) Patients of the State: The Politics of Waiting in Argentina. Durham: Duke University Press.
Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
