This TEXT articulates the MUSE nucleus as a theoretical robot: a composite assemblage of interdependent functions designed to stabilise, audit and metabolise socioplastic operations across heterogeneous contexts. Rather than constituting an abstract logic or prescriptive ideology, the nucleus operates as an infrastructural mechanism composed of ten minimal functions—field detection, boundary inscription, procedural rule, ordering syntax, filtration, trace registration, adaptive modulation, closure, scalar continuity and internal review. Each function performs a discrete operational task while remaining structurally interlocked with the others, producing a coherent yet context-agnostic architecture. The system autovalidates not through external benchmarking but via recursive internal sensing: deviations become legible as functional discontinuities. This robotic model reframes structure as embodied operativity, enabling deployment within urban, artistic and governance domains without epistemic drift. The result is a metabolically efficient core capable of sustaining transformation while preserving architectural integrity.
The theoretical robot must be understood as an operative organism rather than a metaphorical device. Its constitution is infrastructural: ten minimal functions assembled into a coherent chassis capable of deployment across multiple domains. Each function performs a necessary task—detecting a field, marking a boundary, ordering action—yet none alone defines the system. The nucleus emerges from functional aggregation, not conceptual abstraction; it is the sum of executable capacities that prevent socioplastic processes from dissolving into indeterminacy. Autovalidation occurs through recursive sensing embedded within the architecture itself. The system does not compare outputs against external models; instead, it monitors whether each function remains active and proportionally aligned with the original design. Structural deviation manifests as perceptible imbalance—absence of boundary, excess of tension, procedural incoherence—thereby triggering internal review. This internal auditability transforms validation from evaluative judgement into mechanical detection. Crucially, the robot does not prescribe content; it stabilises conditions. Its deployment across urban intervention, artistic production or organisational governance relies upon scalar invariance: the same functional assembly operates irrespective of size or context. What changes is implementation, not architecture. In this sense, the MUSE nucleus exemplifies metabolic governance—a minimal, durable core enabling transformation without structural entropy.
Lloveras, A. (2026) Socioplastics
510-systemic-lock https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18682555 509-postdigital-taxidermy https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18682480 508-topolexical-sovereignty https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18682343 507-citational-commitment https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18475136 506-recursive-autophagia https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681761 505-proteolytic-transmutation https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681278 504-stratum-authoring https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18680935 503-semantic-hardening https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18680418 502-cameltag https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18680031 501-flow-channeling https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18678959
*
We have been working with a complex idea: a stable core for socioplastic operations. The image of the robot helped us see it clearly. A machine doesn't dream. It works. It insists. It repeats functions until they are done. Creation is not magic. It is this: showing up and running the program. Here is the program. Ten minimal functions. That is all. That is the whole chassis. It is not an ideology. You cannot believe in it. It is not a style. It has no visual form. It is not an aesthetic. It produces no image.
Detect where you are. (Field detection)
Know how far you go. (Boundary inscription)Have clear rules for action. (Procedural rule)
Order what you do. (Ordering syntax)
Filter what is useless. (Filtration)
Remember what happened. (Trace registration)
Adjust without breaking. (Adaptive modulation)
Know when to stop. (Closure)
Grow without changing shape. (Scalar continuity)
Review yourself to stay on track. (Internal review)
