The longitudinal trajectory of LAPIEZA-LAB from 2009 to 2025 delineates a sophisticated chronotopology of artistic becoming, wherein each temporal segment operates as both autonomous inquiry and cumulative infrastructural layer. The Foundational Aperture inaugurates a domestic laboratory paradigm, subverting institutional exhibition logics by instituting rhythm as ontology—weekly mutations that reconfigure material scarcity into conceptual abundance. This embryonic intensity accelerates into a methodological constant, whereby serial production evolves into a self-reflexive system of knowledge inscription, transforming enumeration into epistemic architecture. As the project expands its lexicon, each titled series functions dually as poetic condensation and empirical coordinate, generating a cartography of affective and conceptual territories resistant to stylistic closure. The closure of the Palma 15 space in 2012 does not signify cessation but rather a phase transition toward nomadic infrastructurality, wherein the body in transit supersedes the fixed site, and relational encounters become the primary medium of inscription. This mobility engenders dialogic density, crystallising in structural conversations that reframe pedagogy as co-constructed cognition within distributed networks. The Expansive Epoch further amplifies this condition through international residencies, translating local socio-material textures into affective geometries, while projects such as FLOCK exemplify decentralised collective authorship as a dynamic system without hierarchical command. The subsequent Recreo phase introduces a deliberate deceleration, where rural immersion in Ávila facilitates an ecological reorientation toward slow temporality and vegetal minimalism, culminating in cinematic choreographies that entwine landscape, body, and restorative movement. By 2025, the oscillation between introspective states and global activations signals a mature living archive, exceeding mere documentation to function as a cyborgian matrix of relations, poised to transition into territorially embedded ruralist praxis.

LAPIEZA-LAB, under the direction of Anto Lloveras, constitutes a paradigmatic shift from discrete artistic production toward an infrastructural, post-objectual praxis wherein temporality, relationality, and iterative processes supersede the static artefact as primary mediums. At its conceptual nucleus resides Socioplastics, a methodology that reconceptualises art as a catalytic agent within socio-symbolic ecosystems, mobilising relational exchanges to counteract the reductive logics of post-industrial commodification. This orientation engenders a relational epistemology, whereby knowledge is not hierarchically transmitted but co-emerges through dialogic assemblages, situational encounters, and distributed cognition. The project’s extensive serial output—comprising over 180 indexed series and thousands of interlinked nodes—operates as a structured yet generative taxonomy, in which enumeration, naming, and sequencing function as both curatorial mechanisms and epistemic devices. Crucially, LAPIEZA-LAB inverts the conventional hierarchy between artwork and archive, positing accumulation itself as the principal medium, thereby transforming the archive into a living, operative infrastructure. This evolution is further articulated through five temporal epochs, each reconfiguring spatial, social, and ecological relations—from the embryonic domestic laboratory to a nomadic international network, and ultimately to a territorially embedded rural praxis where landscape becomes pedagogy. A salient case emerges in the Ruralist Epoch, where situated knowledge production in Galicia exemplifies how artistic practice can function as territorial listening, synthesising ecological awareness with communal inscription. Consequently, LAPIEZA-LAB crystallises as a sovereign, self-reflexive system that redefines curating as an infrastructural act, establishing a durable, machine-readable corpus that bridges artistic research with academic legibility while sustaining a dynamic, evolving field of knowledge production.