We write every day, not only about the system itself but also through many essays that move both forwards and backwards across the work. This sustained practice gives the project greater mass, because ideas are not left isolated: they accumulate, return, and thicken over time. At the same time, we name what we are doing, we archive it, and we maintain a clear sense of order. Precisely for that reason, testing other scales becomes productive for us, since the material is already structured enough to be expanded, reorganised, and read in different ways.

By naming the field Socioplastics, Lloveras is wagering that this structured and archived logic can become transferable, allowing others to enter, test, adapt, and extend the system beyond the circumstances of its origin. In this sense, daily writing is not secondary to the research but one of its primary constructive operations: each essay adds density, each act of naming increases legibility, and each archival decision strengthens the field’s internal coherence. The movement between retrospective reflection and prospective theorisation gives the work cumulative mass, turning scattered intellectual labour into a durable and navigable territory. Order, therefore, is not reducible to administration; it is an epistemic technology that makes continuity possible across time and across scales.