RecursiveAutophagia is the point where Socioplastics converts post-structural critique into operational architecture. Its lineage is clear: Derrida appears in the internal digestion of contradiction, where deconstruction becomes recursive breakdown and re-inscription rather than endless deferral; Foucault appears in the corpus as self-governing discursive formation, capable of excavating its own archive, exposing sedimented rules and reconfiguring relations between strata; Deleuze and Guattari appear in the machinic loop of deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation, although Lloveras stabilises that rhizomatic energy inside a vertical stratigraphic spine; Lyotard appears in the refusal of fixed metanarrative, with autophagia generating local rules, micro-narratives and paralogical mutations from within; Baudrillard appears more obliquely, in the self-consumption of prior representations, where documentation, project and discourse implode into higher-order field reality. The decisive move, however, is not citation but translation. RecursiveAutophagia turns deconstruction into protocol, genealogy into maintenance, schizoanalysis into metabolic routing, textual instability into controlled transformation. Post-structuralism often diagnoses the instability of meaning; Socioplastics engineers that instability as a repeatable system. The corpus eats itself without collapsing. It softens hardened terms, breaks down redundant layers, reabsorbs past material and repositions it through new strata. This makes the project post-post-structural: it inherits critique but refuses to remain in critique. It moves toward epistemic sovereignty, where self-questioning and structural confidence coexist. RecursiveAutophagia is therefore not theoretical ornament. It is post-structural thought rebuilt as operating system.
