It begins with searching: the movement through books, images, streets, conversations, films, maps, archives, laboratories, museums, platforms and accidental encounters by which a territory gradually becomes perceptible. Search is not merely preparation for research; it is already an epistemic arrangement because every search directs attention, establishes priorities and opens some paths while leaving others invisible. FlowChanneling identifies this movement as organised transmission rather than neutral circulation: interfaces, recommendations, bibliographies, institutions and personal habits determine what reaches us and what remains outside the field of perception. Knowledge production therefore begins by learning to recognise and redesign these channels. Yet searching acquires depth only through return. RecurrenceMass names the intellectual weight produced when a place, question, image or text is encountered repeatedly before becoming formally indispensable. A walk repeated across the same district reveals relations that a single visit cannot disclose; a book reopened after another experience becomes a different book; an initially obscure photograph begins to organise a larger constellation. The distinction between curiosity and research lies partly in this duration. Searching constructs the first room of a knowledge installation: a provisional environment whose boundaries expand through disciplined attention. Its structure is neither prescribed in advance nor left entirely to chance. It emerges from the sustained negotiation between openness and direction, dispersion and recurrence, discovery and the responsibility to remain with what has been found long enough for it to begin producing knowledge.
Ahmed, S. (2006) Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bates, M.J. (1989) ‘The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques’. Online Review, 13(5), pp. 407–424.
Benjamin, W. (2008) The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Berger, J. (1972) Ways of Seeing. London: BBC/Penguin.
Borges, J.L. (1962) Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings. New York: New Directions.
Bush, V. (1945) ‘As We May Think’. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), pp. 101–108.
Careri, F. (2017) Walkscapes: Walking as an Aesthetic Practice. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Debord, G. (2006) ‘Theory of the Dérive’, in Knabb, K. (ed.) Situationist International Anthology. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets, pp. 62–66.
Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.
Enwezor, O. (2003) ‘The Postcolonial Constellation: Contemporary Art in a State of Permanent Transition’. Research in African Literatures, 34(4), pp. 57–82.
Anto Lloveras is a Spanish architect, urbanist, researcher and epistemologist working across open science, knowledge infrastructures, radical pedagogy and contemporary culture. His practice investigates how dispersed materials become coherent, durable and publicly accessible fields of knowledge. CV · https://antolloveras.blogspot.com/2024/10/cv.html · Project Index · https://antolloveras.blogspot.com/p/socioplastics-project-index.html · Operators · Lloveras, A. (2026) ‘FlowChanneling’, Socioplastics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18678959 · Lloveras, A. (2026) ‘RecurrenceMass’, Socioplastics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18998404
