This systematic review examines agritourism from an environmental psychology perspective and explores its relevance for productive rural landscapes and extensive livestock systems. Following PRISMA 2020, the study moves from 612 initially identified records to a final analytical corpus of 20 empirical studies, using Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar across the 2016–2025 period. The review identifies six interrelated dimensions: motivation, satisfaction, trust, loyalty and segmentation; well-being, restoration and quality of experience; environmental sustainability and pro-environmental practices; place attachment, identity and heritage; social sustainability, participation and social capital; and governance, indicators, accessibility and infrastructure. A central finding is the imbalance between the relatively well-represented visitor experience and the weaker evidence concerning producers, local communities, labour conditions, gender, benefit distribution, governance and long-term territorial processes. The paper therefore reframes agritourism as a person–environment configuration embedded in a rural socioecological system. Two concepts organise this shift: practised productive landscape, understood as territory maintained through labour, knowledge, management and infrastructure, and relational sustainability, which integrates well-being, territorial bonds, environmental coherence, community participation and governance. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22814472
