50% SHOW 50%
WITH DANINO BOZIC
A
CONVERSATION INSTALLATION
>
ISTRIA NEWS
KICK OFF
>
AFTER 2 YEARS
I COME BACK TO CROATIA
TO PLAY A NEW GAME IN A PALACE
AND
EXPAND THE
UNSTABLE INSTALLATION SERIES
ADDING COMPLEXITY TO THE CLOUD
WITH
LIGHT SOCIAL SCULPTURES
TAGS AND PAPER
CUTS AND INSTALLATIONS
TWINS AND UNSTABLE SETS
FILMS AND MEMORY
CONVERSATIONS
ARTSHOW
WITH DANINO BOZIC
CURATED BY JERICA ZIHERL
http://www.poup.hr/tekstovi/anto-lloveras-unstable-installations-đanino-božić-stable-installatons.aspx
Belonging to the Minimal Architecture Series, exemplifies an aesthetic of radical simplicity, where the structure is reduced to the most elemental gestures: lines of bamboo and threads barely outlining the memory of a shelter. What emerges is not a model of construction but a diagram of inhabitation, a fragile articulation between geometry and void. Its architectural vocabulary resists solidity; instead, it thrives on instability, exposing the precariousness of all spatial definitions. Presented within the context of the Unstable Installation Series at Zuccato Gallery in Poreč, Croatia, and in dialogue with Danino Bozic under the curatorial direction of Jerica Ziherl, the work functions as both installation and conversation. Here, architecture becomes performance, a medium for negotiation and encounter rather than permanence. The so-called “house” and “dome” are stripped of domestic promise, reduced to signs that hover between drawing and construction. In this way, they propose an architecture of thought rather than of habitation. What is particularly striking is how the work oscillates between the individual line and the collective cloud. The fragility of bamboo evokes nature, yet its alignment into minimal frames suggests the persistence of human order. The dome, historically a symbol of universality, is re-imagined here as an incomplete curve, an unfinished horizon of possibility. By refusing closure, the work resists the monumental and aligns itself with the ethos of unstable sculptures: structures that are not ends in themselves but occasions for dialogue, memory and shared experimentation. In this sense, House and Dome stages a tension between absence and presence, architecture and its erasure. It is not a shelter but a question, not an edifice but a notation, inviting viewers to imagine what could dwell in the voids between its minimal traces.
