The corpus gathered across the site constitutes a sustained theoretical and artistic inquiry into what might be termed a socioplastic paradigm of space. Rather than conceiving architecture as a stable object or urbanism as a regulatory system, the work reframes both as relational, affective, and processual practices. Across installations, texts, performative devices, and spatial interventions, architecture is displaced from the regime of representation toward one of activation. The city appears not as a finished artefact but as a mutable ecology of gestures, rituals, and minor infrastructures.
